Benedict XVI is rushing to push forward Modernist ideologies in higher places by promoting the so-called Cardinal Marc Ouellet of Quebec as Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, Archbishop Rino Fisichella as the first President of the new Pontifical Commission for Promotion of the New Evangelization, “a new Vatican department devoted to reawakening the faith in the West, especially Europe”, and Bishop Kurt Koch of Basel, Switzerland, as President of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity and the Commission for Religious Relations with Jews.
There is a New Evangelization on the horizon. For how can the new faith revitalize Europe and the West with the more same old stuff, such as with the right of religious liberty of man of every religion, ecumenism (cooperation of religions for the betterment of mankind), collegiality (that the bishops with the Pope hold supreme authority in the Church, in spite of the fact that that Pope alone has that power, consequently making bishops autonomous in their own dioceses in union with the Pope), and false ecclesiology (that the Church of God is not identical to the Catholic Church, but rather much bigger than the Catholic Church, however subsists in the Catholic Church in the fullness of truth)?
Even Kasper at a farewell session with reporters in Rome, described the effort to restore Christian unity as the “construction site of the church of the future.”
Yes, you heard it right, there is a need of Christian unity and that is the hope of the church of the future. However passé is the notion of Christian unity in the Catholic Church, no longer by the profession of one faith and under the rule of the Pope.
“Instead of accusing others, and even the pope, of wishing to go back to before the council, everyone would be well advised to look over their own books and reassess their own personal position on the council,” he wrote. “Not everything that was said and done after the council, was therefore done in accordance with the council.” said Koch.
But which portion from above was not prescribed by the Second Vatican Council? All of them? Yet, it is the same old stuff we have been getting from Rome for over 50 years. It is a renovation of Vatican II and we are anticipating the results. There is no going back to before the council, because there is no good in doing that, but to keep looking over their own books and reassess their own personal position on the council, endlessly.
And who can forget the religious relations with the Jews who have rejected Christ? After all, their covenant is still valid?